Joe Lieberman Articles

Another terrible piece of legislation from John McCain

We all remember McCain-Feingold and McCain-Kennedy, now Senator McCain and his fellow neoconservative Joe Lieberman have introduced an "enemy aggressive interrogation, detention and prosecution of the law of 2010. This fine piece of legislation would allow the U.S. military detained American citizens without trial indefinitely in the U.S. on suspicion of activity.

Their is no difference between U.S. citizens and non-US citizens and to hell with Miranda warnings.

You areregarded as "aggressive" if you meet one of the following criteria:
1) a threat to attack civilians and civilian objects, in the U.S. or U.S. facilities abroad
2) a threat to American military personnel and U.S. military installations
3) the potential intelligence value
4) is a member of al-Qaeda or terrorist groups linked to al-Qaeda
5) other matters which the President deems appropriate.

Being a "potential intelligence value?" "Other mattersPresident deems appropriate? "That should scare to get out of you.

That could be me or you. We might be kidnapped by the government and interogated voicing a dissenting opinion. Bye-Bye Bill of Rights!

Why do John McCain and Joe Lieberman (and as a side note, Massachusetts, Republican Senator Scott Brown is one of the co-sponsors. Hate to say it, but I told you.) A few such contempt Cosponsors Bill of Rights and personal freedom andfreedoms?

Knowing these two characters must be linked to the "war on terror". It seems that a vague reference to scare more and more people giving up their freedom for some supposed safety. Did Ben Franklin, when we talk about?

If you find this type of legislation repugnant and reprehensible, call your Senator and Representative and tell them to vote no on this bill.

Thanks To : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

McCain Palin for Vice-examined Presidential Running Mate

October 4, 2008 – Archery at the request of many of his supporters, Senator John McCain asked Governor Sarah Palin to step aside. Palin agreed to understand their reasons and did not want to split the party. She turned to Senator Hillary Clinton, who said: "You should just stay in the race, no matter what." More sanguine ', I always say. "

Two hours later, McCain called a press conference to announce his new vice-presidential running mate, Representative McAbel.

Onea minute later, a new poll showed McCain supporters did not like his choice McAbel, and offered to double the campaign contributions if asked Governor Palin to return to the ticket. McCain appeared agitated momentarily, but you said: "I'm sticking with McAbel. It was a good man with good values, and I'm sure that is favored by God for all the good work and sacrifices that made them."

As conservatives and liberals share the feelings of unease. House Minority Leader John Boehner hasquoted as saying, "Instead of McAbel, I'd rather see McCain Joe Lieberman, Mickey Mouse or Bill Clinton." Clinton, high-profile liberal known primarily for that matter, and the second that the president of the nation, said: "I agree with John Boehner. Well, I've never stabbed. Thank you."

Senator Lindsay Graham got on record saying: "I can not remember enough about it, but something McAbel McCain ticket makes me nervous. I gotfeeling of fear that I can not explain. "It is surprising, Senators Barack Obama and Joe Biden totally agree with Graham. In addition, Obama made the comment:" I wish I could say what it is that bothers me, but it feels a little weird. Although, even though I found I still could not say, all I can say is 'change'. "

Amidst this debate, no release to the media, why they decided that the Secret Service ordered four times the amountsecurity for leaders McAbel than before in view of Governor Palin. After the sixth or seventh eve of increased guard, we asked again about the order. Adams, head of intelligence, just shrugged and said: "Just know.

Some of the surrounding McAbel may be due to their inexperience, which is a popular topic at this time of globalized economy and terrorist activities. These concerns were raised about Barack Obama, and more recently the less, Abraham Lincoln.George Washington was also investigated because of his level of experience, mainly because never has been elected to any office in the United States of America.

McAbel take-all in step, but even in its statement to the press and said: "Even though I was a prosecutor for three weeks and have little political experience, I was elected the best shepherd in my class 1979th I look forward to serving John McCain, and serve God and all hisflock and Americans. Despite John's served in Washington, I know him well and respect him. Almost, because I met John McCain was like my brother. "

Visit : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

Vice President?

Christians are quite aware that it is commanded to "avoid
appearance of evil. "Vice President and Chairman
United States of America tell us that they are Christians and the rest
easy, they just seem to be dealing with evil. As Vice
President, in fact, that the United States President?

Vice President Cheney recently responded to a question concerning
awarding no bid Halliburton. His answer was
That has something to do withprocurement and
not know how to influence them. If I were Vice President
and wanted to help a friend win a contract, I would call
friend and ask how I could help. My friend would know exactly
what to do. It does not seem so hard to me.

In order to prevent evil, by Vice President Cheney
Halliburton won the day, withdrew its first offer no
contracts in Iraq or Afghanistan. On this day, President
should haveasked to resign, if they avoid
appearance of evil. It is a coincidence of these lines
often speak of evil? They mirror? That is, they are
They blame others mistakes in their dislike me?

In one segment 25 Edition notice January 60 minutes, we learn
subsidiary of Halliburton, which deals with terrorist
state support. This means that the war against terrorism, money
do fraud? Therefore, the target of American justicewas
switching from Al-Qaeda in Iraq in November 2001? New
business for all our good friends? It just shows that so.
Do not you worry 'bout a thing, King George is at the top
world. Either these men are Christian or evil does not
appearance.

Today is 26.ledna 2004th I was listening
major campaign to cover the National Public Radio, waiting for
hear a candidate who is going to make Vice President Cheney and
Halliburtoncampaign issue. All candidates tiptoe
the issue until after the primaries in February? Are American
companies in support of terrorist states
no problem? America is everything to pretend that there are no evil
high? Ask me next month.

A cold shiver down my spine, I believe that could be
Capitol broad cover-up takes place, in which Senators John
Kerry, John Edwards and Joe Lieberman to participate.If so, we
can be expected that none of them increase the Halliburton – Cheney
scandal as a campaign issue.

What a coincidence, Senator Kerry should also have very good
interview segment on the same program 60 minutes! It is possible
one on staff is connected to Kerry interview with Kerry
The story of the horrors of profits? We will all soon know.

Perhaps none of the Democratic candidates Care
appearance or evil, and I was right Capitolwide
conspiracy to hide the truth. True, it looks so clear
me, maybe evil resign under threat of armed rebellion.
(Which would be labeled as domestic terror, of course.) Hopeless
what?

(Publishers! Free Promotion Here – Now! If you leave a comment and a URL or a hypertext link to this article or any of my: 1). Some of my on – site readers will visit your website. 2nd) I will visit your website. If I like what I find, I will write a positivereview and publish it here at EzineArticles. Now you can delete this generous offer when re – publishing this article.)

Tags : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

What choice Sarah Palin says about John McCain

Last country

The selection of Sarah Palin, John McCain showed that not jeopardize their "country first." # 1 The criteria for selection of Vice President should be able to move into the role of the Presidency as soon as possible. The age of McCain and his health problems, which criteria is more important, with this option. Palin is obviously not qualified to be president, if Palin is qualified to be president then you are probably millions of other Americans. That is, how farThey bar. Being a mayor of 5,000 people with virtually no accountability just is not impresssive, no matter how many times they say "executive experience" anyone with any sense knows this is bull.

This choice shows that McCain gives a policy before his country. He made the choice to appeal to social conservatives who form the base of the Republican Party and as a cynical appeal to voters Hillary Clinton, not because he thinks that Palin would be goodPresident McCain, if he can not complete his term.

No Maverick

McCain's campaign has tried to spin this selection as evidence that McCain's "maverick", but it actually proves the opposite. McCain wanted to choose Joe Lieberman as his VP, but also the social conservative base of GOP clearly did not want to let that happen without a fight convention floor. He was forced into choosing Palin the same social conservatives. This means that the selectiondoes not prove McCain is a maverick, instead, it means that it is a pawn of the same voting block that has George W. Bush elected twice.

Poor Case

It is increasingly clear that the McCain campaign did not complete the review of work on Sarah Palin. Selection was apparently on Thursday night (maybe after an incredible speech that Barack Obama.) It was the response options, not one of careful consideration as Obama's choice of JoeBiden.

Visit : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

Hillary Clinton is leaning to the truth?

Hillary Clinton may be the Democratic Party's leading candidate for president, but she leaned too far towards the conservative right? There is no doubt that it is a seasoned veteran in the political arena who believe in her playing cards with deliberation and care. But for some time, she was still courting the correct action.

Take for example speech given in January 2005, when she spoke about the importance of sexual abstinence for teenagers. Soon thereafter, the sharestage with Republican leaders such as Rick Santorum and Sam Brownback, a conservative Democratic Joe Lieberman, at a press conference where Capitol Hill leaders called for federal funding of research on the influence of electronic media such as computers and i-pods on the behavior of child development.

Conservative quarter also seems to respond to Clinton. For example, the drawing of admiration for her position in foreign policy. The beam withfellow Democrat Barack Obama during a Democratic presidential debate about whether the president should meet the anti-American leaders without pre-conditions during their first year in office-it won applause from the established right-wing like Fred Barnes Weekly Standard, National Review Rich Lory and New York Times columnist, David Brooks.

The question is whether Clinton's loyalty to the right to insult the Democratic electoral base, with significant left-wing bias. Well,her supporters seem too worried about it. However, should Hillary Clinton be careful to avoid tilting the balance too far on both sides.

Visit : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

Brazen Thievery

Facebook friend of mine recently remarked that there was a time when bribery and corruption made behind closed doors. Now hold a press conference to announce their price. He's right … and we've just witnessed the last proof the Democrats tried to push their senators, to Barack Hussein Obama health insurance passed.

Unapologetic Harry Reid said, "The number of states are treateddifferently than other states. That is whatlegislation primarily: compromise. "Which means those held were even more taxpayers' money allocated to their home countries. As usual, those opposed to government takeover came as soon as the end of the financial stick while those overturning pressure reaped rewards from the top of his betrayal.

Most everyone is aware of 300 million U.S. dollars Louisiana Purchase Mary Landrieu and Cornhusker Kickback showed that Ben Nelson does not deserve to be referred to as "Honorable. "These are just two examples of Harry Reid, who fall into the practice of bribing Chicago thugocracy obstacle to their plans. It is possible to avoid the worse fate of" suicide "in Fort Marcy Park … not that ever happened in the national capitol .

Club conservatives in the house, drew up a list of several benefits of using individual senators who might object to one or more aspects of this sinister plan.

Carl Levin onMichigan secured the exemption for non-profit insurance, Michigan insurance … Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan plans in particular.

Bernie Sanders of Vermont added 10 billion U.S. dollars for community health centers and the National Health Service Corps.

Bill Nelson has negotiated an agreement where the Florida Medicare Advantage participants in the acquired system and will be able to maintain their coverage.

Akaki Daniel and Daniel Inouye saw to it thatDisproportionate share hospital (DSH) extension Hawaiian hospital, which is a facility serving a disproportionate share of Medicaid and uninsured persons. No other State has received this extension.

Joe Lieberman agreement that hospitals in Connecticut and Michigan would receive an extension of section 508 of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003, which would bring higher reimbursement for services.

Chris Dodd secured 100 million U.S. dollars for the "Health CareDevice "on public research universities, which could only apply to the University of Connecticut.

Max Baucus, before his speech before the Senate drunken received funding for an extensive pilot program to help residents in the vicinity of EPA Superfund site near Libby, Montana.

This is the pork on a scale never seen before. I can only think of the words of one of the heroes of my childhood – Illinois Senator Everett Dirksen, who said: "A billion here, billions there, and soon youtalking about real money. "And that was fifty years ago, when a billion dollars a lot of money.

It is clear that none of those looking for something more than their own benefit. It is also clear that none of them really deserves to be known as "Reverend". Many of the elected elite have heard ad nauseum from their voters, that people just do not want the socialist regime. Still, he looks forward in the race to destroy the best healthcare system inworld. We are in the fight against this philosophical grounds alone. We are in this fight in the welfare of young, older and unrelated, who could lose their lives due to lack of care. This program is in real life and death consequences, and so many are against this plan, with a passion for professional discussion.

This reallocation of insurance crowding is disrupted each of our families, ability to work and take care of our young and old, and weExpected to write or call those who represent us. We were doing this and we were ignored. Polite request fell on deaf ears … time to increase the level or two. The only thing we have left is to follow the instructions Ronaldus Magnus, he said: "If you can not make them see the light, to avoid the feeling of heat." Time out with torches and pitchforks!

Related : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

Switching Policy

Huge confusion appeared in the 2008 electoral process. I could have sworn, by the Democratic majority was elected in 2008. It is difficult to argue that the conclusion of the antics of the Republican Party, so-called Blue Dog Democrats. Republican and Democratic parties were on the logistics of war for decades, as well as all the parties, and it began with the first United States President George Washington. The president asked for his constituents, which polarizeinto competing factions, but they listen to him and his second term, had the polarized sides. Republicans, it would be contrary to the Democrats is nothing unusual. Maybe me many techniques and methods used, but they are frequent disagreements. The last Republican minority does not seem to understand that they were voted from power by voters who were dissatisfied with their performance and their inheritance of power.

It is thoseelected party, using the party platform, the financing of political parties and the voters who will vote out of it what they ran away and promised voters that concern me. This is particularly true when the legislators vote as a block immediately after the election, and shall be positioned as a medium group. That smacks of dishonesty and predestined in the primary and electoral process. If independent and Blue Dogs are, who they are, should be runon this platform instead of misrepresenting their position as the Democrats. I have no problem with them being independent and say it, get support, funding, and their voices said positions. I have a problem with them holding themselves out to voters falsely, using the current situation.

Before you think I want everyone to vote strict party ticket, I do not. Every member of Congress is unique, and that it should be. There are liberalsConservatives and moderates in any group of people. The policy itself is the art of compromise. Each person is voted into office by voters who expects certain behavior from their representatives, as the platform on which the agent ran. At the end of each day, the vote comes from within man.

However, I want every member of Congress to remember that when running on a particular party ticket, each voter lead to believe that they willprinciples which would mean if we give them work. On the basis of their presentation of themselves, then we voted. If you did not have these values, you have no right to carry on this ticket. That is not "politics", which for me is a lie. Do you hold that it is something that is not. If this is true, it is a lie. If you own one thing, and you know, at that moment that you do not intend to honor that representation, are worse than a liar. Missing Youand integrity. You have no right to ask for my vote on the basis of lies.

American nation as a collective by the end of nonsense that is going on until this moment. We should make clear the famous pendulum swing in the opposite direction, because it is too far left is not too much better than the truth. Our elected representatives should have at least a step in the direction that we chose the voters on election day, which is ahead and do what is necessary to determine what is wrong. If you run awere elected to a specific platform, something that he took an oath to do, in a way that they advertised themselves. Switching parties soon after its election can be considered a lie, because it certainly is not true.

After the 2009 presidential inauguration, reports announced that the long-term conservative Senator Arlen Specter decided to change the Republican Party from a Democrat. How do I feel now about the party switch is based on what I said earlier in this article? Hmmm! Senator Specterconservative for four fixed dates and seeks his 5th term on the Republican ticket. His original party lost votes big time in 2008 in the North (he is from Pennsylvania). Senator Specter is doubtful that 1) his party could win, and 2) he personally can win. Does this mean that he right to "switch" so he can try to get a better conclusion to vote? I do not know the direct answer to this question. Every voter in Pennsylvania will have to be better informed than thatquestion can be answered. What can we see?

Look at his vote. Look at his political affiliation. Who wants to spend time with, at the lunch side? What does trouble champion? What problems does veto it? He says that the moderate Republican, but his voting record over the last 24 years that support? His result of the vote seems to be relatively independent of the conservative, was his swing vote on several occasions. His attitude posting solidDuring the previous regime just icing on the cake for eight years that the administration?

To be fair, the moderates in the Republican Party seems to be in no-man's land when the hard-liners are distorted party further and further right. Medium would be good to a new position within his own party. They stay with their party, or go on? This is a legitimate question. Senator Specter is not alone in distress as a Republican. Did you discussthat anxiety and its intention to change the political parties, because he felt like a stranger in his own party, which has increasingly influenced by hard-liners on the right and radical scholars? Or is it a desperate attempt to transform party clings to power, as proposed, or the Democratic Party are broadly consistent with its current policy stance? These are the questions facing the huge Pennsylvania voters in the coming elections. These are also huge issues facingDemocratic Republican party as welcome into their midst for the next six years. Fiscal Conservative may be on the side of hope and change? It changed its heart realistic?

Did Senator Specter to sell its own voting public in one direction and then act differently when they got into position, as I described in my earlier writing? Or is it a legitimate shift in consciousness, which none of us can fault. We have the right to change my mind if we feel it is warranted. Why is realquestion. I think that Senator Specter has remained reasonably faithful representation of his first four electoral process, voting separately rather seems to be a way of life for him. Did not move right, his party did. He was faced with a decision made that the parties went, and now the voters in their state to determine whether to continue. Has clearly expressed its position, its reasons and we are on the state's voters. While he might have politicallydecision (any politically motivated person would), he said his position and intent and I can not fault that.

Before you complain that I do not like Republicans, have the same long, hard look at the Blue Dog Democrats on the other side of the political aisle. Many of them will re-elections and over the next few elections. Do not be fooled by any of the parties. A large stone is a large stone, whether it is painted blue or red. Conformity versus change is really impressivethings right and it is not over. Even though we are about what happened to Senator Joe Lieberman. Ran on the Democratic ticket as Vice President Gore. Was something other than a Democrat in recent years, but decided to run as an independent, and was re-elected. From my point of view, leans Republican. This week I looked at the press conference and stood in the Republican group. Actions speak louder than words. Discussion can be cheap. See the naturaljurisdiction and legislative result of the vote for the truth. If it myself that it is independent, but the voice kept on one side of the aisle, there is a contradiction between what he says and what it does. His vote should show the independence claims.

Losing party in any election is not usually in good spirits and doing their best to restrict those who were elected by congressional action and no matter which party wins or loses. I'm sure you can see howsuccess would create. This is not what our Founding Fathers necessarily wanted, but that's what we have. Congress, are equally strong, the president, often believes that there is no need to listen to the public who elected them. Once in office, you, and campaigns and promises mean very little. If our leader is in the opposition party, the Congress, that Congress gets to promote their own agenda, hoping that the leader look bad. Alternatively, it could decide to removePresidential agenda, leading from his own party, can be successfully elected next time. I think that it is running the country just about as successful as my previous statement, right? The best example that comes to mind when it is (unfortunately) for another Republican / Democrat pairings: Newt Gingrich vs. Clinton in 1994 and 1996. If you want to know what happened, look up. Just remember to look into the facts and not personal opinions.

I wish with all my heartThat we could choose individuals in Congress who remember why they were elected. It was playing an obstructionist when you can not get his own way. It was not manipulate, scheme, plot, plan, or the power play for the national side. Not for sexual services and trysts. It was not for photo ops and sound bites. Not to be wined and dined by lobbyists seeking special favors. It was not a really good job as a future lobbyists in their field. It was good toinsurance and pension plan. It was not to make themselves independently wealthy. They are no better than those who claim to serve. Our officers were elected as our brightest and our best to honor and serve the U.S. and its citizens. They are our representatives in all matters which could not be served by public vote (referendum). They have to run the country the best of their abilities, which are not participating in the collapse of our country.

My Links : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

It is difficult to see what Joe wants, except that Joe wants to

I do not want to live in (or vote), Connecticut, and I admit that it is a view from outside, but it's hard to imagine what it is that Joe Lieberman wants.

It seems that what he wants more than anything else at this moment is to be Senator from Connecticut. Easy to understand that. Joe's a member of the club for eighteen years and knows where to find a coat-hook with his name.

It looks as if Joe the spoiler, as hiscomponents turned back to him in the primary. Which is sad to watch. Admirably Joe ran as the Democratic vice-presidential candidate with Al Gore.

Al was able to get through not beaten, and it seems Lieberman just can not figure out how to deal with regular old honest loss when it comes.

Politicians pay homage to the power of ballot. A good many of them had to override that privilege when he stood against them. Standing, shaking hands andsaid: "I want my voice" is the time-honored spectacle in American politics.

He stood up and said, "I heard you, and I think you are wrong, and I will run as an independent in November," It's a shame that all the Joe ran away. It's like saying your home crowd, who know what they are doing and have no idea about a tragic mistake that was made. It's put-down and insulting the same people who sent to the Senate three times.
Who knows? Mighthome-people like Joe did not provide his vice-presidential election in 2000, keeping his Senate seat. It's possible Joe 'is just supply. The gas, beyond time and out of sanity. Honestly it would be Ned Lamont shake hands, give him a set of keys to the office and campaign for him.

If Joe lost as an independent candidate, which seems likely to be made a fool, but my old dad always said that nobody could make you a fool, butthemselves. If he wins, says the club with Democrats in the Senate, but his coat-hook may not be as reliable as once lifted a reputation in this rarified atmosphere. If he and Lamont to lose his Republican opponent, almost sure-thing Joe will retire shamefully.

In 2004, Connecticut went Democrat, 54% to 44% and it voted more or less the same way and at the same rate for the last three or four choices. But still, you slice it, that 54% isloser when it is divided into two Democrats. Even if the Republicans are particularly unpopular this November, it will squeak. Definitely not a pretty sight to watch two 'democracy' savage one another, but it would be a great Republican campaign ads nationwide.

What resonates most significantly to the crowd is Joe Lieberman 's age and you can bet that run, that play for yardage every time a brawl. But some of Joe's positionwere very difficult to swallow for the Connecticut Democrats. Not even the war in Iraq-there are many honest people who do not know how to get the hell out.

But Joe was uncritical when honest criticism was in very short supply and needy. So many of his fellow-Democrats, and it remains to be seen what price they pay for what many Americans see as scandalous subservience. Connecticut is New York's bedroom. Willinteresting to see how Hillary middle-road will be played on the campaign trail, but at least it does not face a test in November.

On the Republican side, it's probably a curtain-time or big-money, time, Alan Schlesinger, the current Senate candidate. Throw-away candidate in what is expected to be solid Lieberman country, Schlessinger suddenly the focus of GOP Senate seat, which could be winnable. Hard to move him aside just two and a halfmonths before the election, but the stranger what happened.

But for Joe, this is Johnny Cash's sad to walk into the cold rain. Low-road rhetoric has already started with Lieberman commented after British bomb scare that Lamont's position on getting out of Iraq "will be a huge win for the same people who wanted to blow up these planes in this plot hatched in England."

When initiating such, it is difficult to see Joe Liebermanfrom the election, win or lose with anything that far from what might be called a victory or reputation.

Thanks To : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

Democrats versus Republicans battle is almost over

These are the views of the author, and although I believe that to be true, I'm in that is something other than my opinions.

Since then, the time of Abe Lincoln, the Democrats and Republicans battled for control of the United States of America. At the beginning of both political parties included liberals, conservatives and moderates. As time went by the Democratic Party moved more to the left or 'liberal' and the Republican Party moved more to the right or'Conservative'. This leaves room for fewer and fewer moderates.

Over the past few years, but far, far left was taking control of the Democratic Party and now the revolution is almost complete. The extreme left fanatics practically pushed most slightly left, moderates and conservatives from the Democratic Party. Most of the moderate conservatives and retired learned shut up and go with the tide in order to stay in office. Now the battle for controlin this country has changed, is now the far left against all others. People like Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, Joseph Biden, Robert Byrd, Barbara Boxer, etc. (I do not include Edward Kennedy, because in my opinion, lost touch with reality long ago, and talking to see and hear yourself on the news. ) along with his Hollywood friends, Barbara Streisand, Susan Saranden, Alec Baldwin, Whoopi Goldberg, Martin Sheen, Spike Lee, etc., now runs the Democratic Party and the moderatepeople like Joseph Lieberman, are ignored or offended party, party supporters and much of the press. Extreme left wants only people I think just like them, or will do what they tell them that the Democratic Party. They fear and opposition moderates, conservatives, liberals, middle and everyone else that they can not control.

Extreme left is so far left that, in my view, do liberals seem hard right wing. I do not believe that farLeft cares about America, the American people, or anyone else, except yourself. Extreme left politicians want power and will do anything to get and maintain that power. They claim to support our troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, but they do everything they can do to destroy the military and moral support to terrorists. They use their Hollywood friends and ultra liberal press spreading half-truths, lies, slander and ridiucule about everyone who disagrees with them. They have even taken to givingreaction to President Bush before the speech. Learned from President Clinton, as you credit for something good, what happens and how the blame on others for everything bad that happens. They use people like President Carter, one of the kindest, most care, sincerest and most people are still believed to hold public authorities to critcize current policies of the Bush administration.

President Carter, no program, he is just, as always, a little naiveand excessive confidence in the goodwill of others. He believes that it would be peace on earth, if people followed the dictates of the extreme left, extreme left, so use it as a front.

Extreme Left uses celebrities who are not only naive, but isolated from the real world. Celebrity, which are surrounded by yes men telling them that they are smarter and better than us, celebrities who are rich, do not go to the supermarket for shopping, flying first class, driveregardless of the type of car they wish to live in expensive homes or apartments and pay people to get most everything for them. These people can afford to be idealistic and fight for ideals that can not work. They talk about raising taxes, do not spend all the money they already have, the demand for rehabilitation for drug addicts, after all, only really dealing with drug addicts and other celebrities, rage against the nuclear power plants and new oil, after all they can affordpay their electricity and gas bills, no matter how expensive they are, fighting for the rights of criminals and arms control, after all, are the guards, many of whom are armed and expensive security systems to protect them, so why should they worry about the owner trade, which has been robbed three or four, or a woman who is raped and murdered in her home. Most of these celebrities mean well, but I do not know what it means to live in the real world. Do not tell me that many of thesecelebrity was bad or a bad childhood. That was then, and it is now.

Individuals who have an idea of what is really happening and to act against criminals or support the war against terrorism or the fight for cheap tools or heaven forbid, god, or support that recognizes the rear central politicians, but even worse, support for President Bush mocked and ostracized. Some of them, no matter how talented to even have difficulty obtaining work. Michael Moore, produced poorly againstAdministration and the film is admired by Hollywood, while Mel Gibson is doing well with a movie about Christ and mocked and put to Hollywood. The fact that people are preferred Gibson's film mattered to Hollywood.

I am a bit conservative with a moderate number of moderately liberal beliefs, but the far left is pushing me more and more traffic. I used to believe that you should vote for people, not parties. Now I am forced to vote directly because I am a RepublicanNo Democrat can be trusted to stand up to the far left. I like Joe Lieberman, but will not vote for him because it is likely that the extreme left will eventually push him from office and force him to support them. I like and never believed President Nixon, but today I had to vote for him rather than a Democrat. President Kennedy consider one of our best modern Presidents, but could not, today, vote for him.

Pleople say to me, "What's wrong with Hillary Clinton? Onais moderate .. "I say 'nonsense, what can I say, Hillary Clinton does not believe in anything. She says and does what, they think will get votes and will help consolidate his power. I do not believe that cares nothing more for this country, or to people than her husband. If he believes that the extreme left can get her what she wants to become one of the most rabid members.

The far left has hijacked the Democratic Party and are at war with anyone and everyone who doesdo not follow their dictates. They hide under the name of 'democracy' and argues that they want to change America for the better. What you really want to do is to rule this country, and that was more than in their own image. They want to be free to do what he thinks is best, not what we think is best. They believe that the end justifies the means, and to obtain their rule will lie, cheat, support our enemies, to spend the money that has to do something else that can helpthem.

Regarding the extreme left is concerned, their biggest enemy, at this time is President Bush. They hate him and fear him, and so can do everthing to destroy him. They blame him for everthing that went wrong in the world. Their personality spokeswoman people believe that the problems caused by Hurricane Katrina, all his administration's fault. The fact that both the Democratic mayor of New Orleans and the Democratic Governor of Louisiana were veryslow to act in a call to the Federal Government does not mind, it seems that a few crooked politicians resources spent on them before the storm, benefits for repairs to each other, it does not matter that New Orleans residents never bothered to prepare for a hurricane category 5, the does not matter. All that matters is if they all keep saying that to blame the President, soon everyone will believe it. People like Jay Leno, DavidLetterman and other celebrities and comedians constantly joke about how stupid the president. The fact that he was clever enough to earn college and graduate education, it does not matter, thefact that he was smart enough to become governor of Texas, it does not matter that he was smart enough to become president of the United States does not matter, the fact that he was smart enough to take Laura Bush, does not matter. The decisive factor is that Leno and Letterman joke about his beingstupid, and therefore had to be a fool (This country has opted for a series of Presidents, which can make a bad job in running this country, but I do not believe that we sometimes fool elected president, and when we elect the President stupid, not stupid, that led us to .). I could list many other examples, but this article is already long, so I will not.

Citizens of this country better wake up and start fighting back, or soon will have two party system ordemocratic republican form of government. We will have one side, the far left, and they will rule us. They told us what to think, when it and how it. I do not know about you, but I like my freedom. I want a country with liberals, moderates and conservatives. I want to choose whom to vote. I want to be able to think for themselves. I do not want to be dominated by the far left than I want to be dominated by the far right. I want a country that representsall, a country that is "one country, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all".

Best Link : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

How Democrats Can Win in 2008? (First of two parts)

I. VICTORY OUT WEST

If Democrats gain control of the White House in 2008, they need to bring the brightest star, New York Senator Hillary Clinton. In the event that once again the procession characterless, bland candidate-la Al Gore, Bill Bradley, John Kerry, Michael Dukakis, "Hollerin '" Howard Dean, et al. Can expect the next election day version of St. Valentine's Day Massacre. If the Democrats are once again humbled, they have nothing to look forward to in 2012,if the Republican President-elect makes Gerald Ford-like faux pas or two.

The Democrats, after-promising candidate Gavin Newsom is already out of service. His approval of gay marriage, leaving him with the eccentric plate and knocked him out of the claim. (He is (the new "Governor Moonbeam?"), Bob Graham will name each year, but he is as anonymous as they come. Dennis Kucinich and John Edwards, the two young guns, which can cause a strong showing at the futureDemocratic convention. Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer has the same oddball signs but is seen as a fiscal conservative. Some mention the name Barack Obama, but I see it as a real possibility.

However, if a minority of the candidates is to create a strong pressure in the future, I would bet on the California Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante and New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson. If Bustamante is elected governor in 2006 or 2010, he catapulted to nationalphase, especially if they can solve state fiscal woes. Is intelligent, well-liked and high Latino population in California, New York, Florida and Texas offer a substantial electoral base.

Richardson will also hold sway Latinos and Demo party bigwigs. If Hillary Clinton to win the nomination and Richardson was her choice for Veep, would be a formidable ticket.

Since the DEM no Southern strategy, their hopes are in the west. It is essentialbecause in 2004 George W. Bush won four states with Democratic Governors (New Mexico, Montana, Wyoming and Arizona). These states, along with Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Utah and Nevada to vote as a whole. They are the sum of 53 electoral votes-almost as much as 55-California, which is firmly Democratic. Add this 108-vote bloc in New York, Illinois and Pennsylvania-that have all gone Democratic in every election since 1992 (73 electoral votes total) and the DEM would be 2 / 3on the road to the White House.

Whoever gets the nomination to sleep with two conflicting parties-work and large enterprises. The work was long-time Demo fortress. On the other hand, is funded by the Presidency, and thus partially owned enterprises conglomerates, most of which will contribute 450 million U.S. dollars needed to run a successful campaign. There are other factors to be considered: Gasoline prices, which will have a profound impact on inflation, unemployment andin interest rates. Ost important factor may be whether or not our military engaged in conflict with any number of countries-including North Korea, Iran, Iraq and Southeast Asia-and to what extent.

II. LATINO POWER CAN resuscitate DEMOCRATS?

DEM to focus its strategy on the west, it would be wise to seek an ever-growing Hispanic vote. Not only that Duran and Richardson well-known, but Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has a growing popularity.question will be whether or not he is seasoned enough. But Duran and Richardson will be invaluable when selling platform DEM heavily-Hispanic states, as well as former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Henry Cisneros.

Arizona's population is 25 percent Hispanic. New Mexico's 42nd California, Florida, Texas and New York also have sizable Latino population. These six states account for 162 electoral votes, 60% of the total needed to win. Dramatic increasethe number of Latino citizens in 1990 created a powerful voting bloc that Democrats and Republicans are courting. Statistics show that between 1984 and 1996, the GOP share of Hispanic vote in presidential elections fell from 37 to 21 percent, while voter registration this group increased by almost 30%.

Washington Post, Terry M. Neal writes, "the GOP has long been accused by critics on the left seeking electoral advantage by using race assubtext – to questions of social, busing, affirmative action, immigration and crime – to drive a wedge court white voters. "Bush has approved the rate among black voters is 2%, which is why it would be wise to lure the GOP source. Although blacks to avoid the Republican Party, their voices could not be put in the last two Democratic candidates over the top. That is why DEM must expand its base. It is strange, black American Political Action Committee (BAMPAC) showed that Condoleezza Rice ispopularity (41%) more than half that Jesse Jackson and Colin Powell. However, "Rice experienced the greatest increase in name recognition and approval of assessments. Fifty-nine percent of registered black voters polled knew the name of Rice in 2002, compared to 38 percent last year, and her favorable rating rose to 41 percent this year from 17 percent in 2001. "

Ever-growing influence of Latinos is most evident in California, where they form about 30 percentpopulation. The political weight allow Latinos to fight anti-immigration climate, including the denial of social services for legal immigrants.

California lieutenant governor, Cruz M. Bustamante is expected to launch next gubernatorial bid in 2006. Early elections shows him beating the current Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger 46-42% in two-man race. Bustamante chance to improve Schwarzenegger's popularity is dwindling among fellow Republicans. Moreover, duringNovember election four Schwarzenegger-election initiatives supported were defeated, making him vulnerable come June.

Bustamante tried to be the top post during the 2003 Gray Davis recall vote. State Democratic leaders invited prominent members of the party to run, hope that it would increase the chances of Davis share the seat. Bustamante condemned the appeal, but he ran well, losing 1.3 million votes. Consequently, many DEM for him disloyal. Bustamante also alienatedsome blacks, he "accidentally" used the word "nigger" in the speech.

It is Richardson, who has the more impressive credentials. He was nominated as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. In 1998 he was unanimously confirmed by the U.S. Senate as Minister of Energy. He was elected Governor of "Land of Enchantment" in 2002. He also negotiated with Saddam Hussein and the Government of Sudan to free prisoners, and his work addressing human rights violations, earnedHe nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1995, 1997, 2000 and 2001. He also helped in the arms negotiations with North Korean delegates.

Richardson over fifteen years representing New Mexico's 3rd Congressional District, "he sponsored and passed a bill to maintain and improve health care for rural New Mexicans, as well as a bill to increase the number of nurses in the state. He traveled to Missouri and convinced the producers to open milk dairy factory in eastern New Mexico,creating jobs and ensure economic development of the state. "

Richardson understands the power of Hispanic voting bloc, said: "These are changing political times … We need to band together and that means that Latinos in Florida, Cuban-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Puerto Ricans, South Americans – we have a better network. We have to be more politically minded, we must put aside and think of themselves as Latinos, as Hispanics more than we had in the past. "

Latinos areconcerned about laws that could restrict immigration. Richardson, however, has no clear position on the issue. Declared four counties along the border in New Mexico in the disaster areas and to strengthen the surveillance of borders, suddenly called for an amnesty program, others were against building a fence along the border, calling it "slightly porous." In 2003 he signed a law allowing illegal immigrants to obtain drivers licenses'.

Richardson, what he really believes in a strong alliancebetween the U.S. and Mexico, saying: "Now is the time to increase economic cooperation, our sales of our educational exchanges." Furthermore, Richardson praised the Conservatives for cutting New Mexico state taxes.

Cisneros, who is also the former Mayor of San Antonio has a scandal-ridden past (business, divorce and convicted on false statements, federal officials), but still dominates among Latinos. In Texas, this support is essential. (Cisneros was guiltnegotiated and was fined $ 10,000, but was later pardoned by President Bill Clinton).

He believes that Latinos can make a difference in states representing 214 electoral votes, adding: "We have started to reach critical mass with enough votes to make a difference," said Cisneros. "We have to reach the ability to influence the outcome."

Non-Hispanic candidate DEM may consider is fifty-year-old Montana Governor Brian Schweitzer. He is not entirely throughhis first year in office, however, and has already caused controversy by first selecting the State Republican Senator John Bohlinger and his running mate suggests the return of one of Montana National Guard troops from Iraq to help fight fires throughout the state.

Schweitzer is a farmer and holds a bachelor's degree in international agronomy from Colorado State University and a master's degree in soil science from Montana State. He was also appointed by President Clinton toUnited States Department of Agriculture. In 2000 he ran unsuccessfully for U.S. Senate instead.

As a last resort, Democrats could always emulate George W. Bush and add a shrunken member of the party on their ticket. In such a case could be for Florida Senator Bob Graham. 69-year-old Graham is considered a moderate. Michael Grunwald of the Washington Post says Graham, "Almanac of American policy had described it as" careful, methodical, thorough, hardworking,reliable'-it might as well have added 'zzzzzzz'. "This means that it will not overshadow the top of ticket, it is expected to be Hillary Clinton. Moreover, he comes from a State which has 27 electoral votes, which would be important if the current GOP candidate for governor of Florida Jeb Bush.

Michael Grunwald writes, "Graham different from President Bush on several fronts. Graham supports tax cuts, but they focused more on low-and moderate-income workers. But he is most effective in dismantlingBush record when it comes to fighting terrorism. Graham says the administration is Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda 'on the ropes "after Afghanistan, but it started to focus on going to war against Saddam Hussein … It is running for nomination as centrist.or, he would say, of 'electable wing of the Democratic Party'. "

Health, believes could hinder his chances to be open-heart surgery and would be almost 70 when the campaign begins. Grahambelieves that rather than Joe Lieberman was on the ticket in 2000, Gore won the presidency.

III. COSTS presidential campaign

In the next presidential election is just three years away, but candidates with fundraising, non-stop affair. Before the last ballot of the 2004 election were counted, and both political parties were preparing for the year 2008, the campaign will cost between 450 and 500 million dollars. During the 2004 Presidential CampaignBush and Sen. Kerry raised $ 693,664,838. Each candidate also received 74.6 million in government funding of general election.

Even campaign "reform" laws can not keep the Presidency of corporate America's grip. These laws were adopted to prevent political parties from collecting money from the company and unions. The parties were allowed to receive donations from wealthy individuals (ie, CEOs and a lot), but these gifts were limited. "527group "-a reference to part of that law-is allowed to increase an unlimited amount of money on advertising, usually in the form of attack ads. As in the case of John Kerry, Swift Boat Veterans for truth has launched a successful ad against him in the 2004 presidential campaign.

Congress should adopt legislation that eliminates the donations from so-called "political action committees and all, but individual campaign contributions (with cover). Government couldIn each candidate $ 75 million. Everyone should spend wisely, but more importantly the Presidency would have to be sold by a public officer would no longer be subject to special interest money.

Astronomical cost of financing to keep third party candidates out of the loop, if the ticket is headed by billionaire who can finance his own campaign, or a personality so bizarre that a mere notification 'thinking' of the network is 19 pointspolls. (See Trump, Donald). Even third party ticket with a well-known candidates (H. Ross Perot, Jesse Ventura, Ralph Nader, Pat Buchanan), only a small chance to raise enough money to be competitive, let alone get a significant number of votes. This means that any hope for America First (Buchananites who split with the Reform Party), the Green Party (Nader), Independence (Jesse "The Body" Ventura), Libertarians – with more than 400 elected officials nationwide-including members of the schoolboard committees, etc. (and propulsion, perhaps), Peace & Freedom, Reform Party (formerly the boys Perot and temporarily seized by Bo Gritz) and the Socialist Party.

If Bill Gates bankrolls celebrity-loaded ticket (like Oprah and Warren Beatty), third party candidates will not gather much media attention. Celebrities won elections before the major with nothing more than a clever Audio, most recently Arnold Schwarzenegger in California. (Some might argue thatof Ronald Reagan in 1980, defeating bumbling Jimmy Carter). This wiill keep shining on the political limelight GOP and Democrats, which means that you'll see more personal attacks and distortions of competition has led in all elections since 1988, when George HW Bush ran Michael Dukakis with the infamous "Willie Horton" ads.

While the Democrat strategy work over the Internet fell fees, it will take more than a cyber-leeching, and spending on the campaign to getWhite House. It will take a clear, coherent message from the center. The ticket will more than likely that the star power at the top of the ticket, but it's Vice-presidential slot, which will be identified. The central theme will be "What is the number two man to bring a ticket?" But just as it is, "How much (cash), he can bring a ticket?"

Friends Link : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

We need Independent Party!

Election is over. Call, some representatives of the Democratic Party to get out of Iraq within a few months already begun. Political jockeying advantage in the next election is in full swing. Effort to corner President Bush outlined a few days after the election results were in Nancy Pelosi reminded us – "It's the president of the United States. I respect the office. It's his call." She, of course, was talking about Iraq. In other words, Bush and the Republicans set up totake the blame if we are out of Iraq soon.

Here is how it will play, so we as voters need to ensure that every responsible politician in 2008.

Democrats propose a plan to get out of Iraq, which President Bush will not accept. Will be based on the recommendations of an independent study commission, the commission approved President Bush. Democrats will try to get the President to veto, veto, the Democrats have enough votes to over-ride. So,The President and the GOP will go to blame the election 2008th

Democrats will continue to vote in favor of funds to continue the war in Iraq because they "support the troops but not war. Many Republicans will vote with them on the basis of this mantra.

Democrats propose to increase the national minimum wage, while much state law, trying to force another veto by the President.

Democrats propose changes in tax law to punish so-called "rich" in favor ofso-called "middle class" despite the fact that the richest people pay 85% federal income tax on income that goes to the federal budget. "Take from the rich and give the middle class," the Democrat mantra. This is likely to be vetoed by the president as well. This is a twist on the mantra of John Edwards.

Democrats propose to get rid of a large oil from federal tax credits. This could pass and could be a veto, which is preferred because most Americans think that wegouged at gas pumps. Of course, it ignores the need for big oil to invest in finding new sources of oil and building more refinery capacity. One should be CPA to figure out that one of the Democrats will only play on the emotional triggers in each of us.

Democrats propose to rewrite the rules on prescription drug, which brought a lot cheaper drugs for seniors. They will try to introduce "action clause", that is, to deal with Pharms than the cost of drugs.Sounds good. Plays on our emotions and personal budgets. The fact is that the lack of price controls, which never work (remember Nixon?), Pharms give up discounts voluntarily.

My list is getting too long, right? You already figured out, much of this, right? I am a Republican? Democrat? Independent? My answer is – I'm a voter. I vote for a candidate-by-candidate basis, regardless of party affiliation.

Election 2006 was the disenchantment of voters with the Congress.For me, the vast majority of Americans, Election 2006 was not just about Iraq or immigration, energy, etc. Surveys of public opinion across the board, in every poll, found that Congress had a less-than-30% popularity. This is 10-to-15 points lower than the rating of the President.

Where did this leave us? As stated in my previous job on my blog, we had to choose between the "lesser evil". It is regrettable that the political process is rigged in favor of two political parties.

NeedAn independent group of the same performance as in the primary and general election. Perhaps, as Joe Lieberman showed "a person with a real desire to be" public servant may be elected as an independent candidate.

I hope that young voters reading this will be energized into action and help the true Independent Party. That will change in our antiquated political process. That will get rid of "politicians" and select "public servants" in the future.Some of them will pursue a career in government policy or a government that is really – "and for people" as their promises of the Constitution.

Friends Link : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

Joe Lieberman loses the Democratic base, Republicans Celebrate

Poor Joe Lieberman – how fallen from grace, he is so sudden manner. Just six years ago, the Democratic candidate for Vice President, now he learns that he is unable to convince his party to reelect him fourth term in the Senate.

And as miserable luck would have it, lost the Democratic primary just days before the interruption horrific terrorist plan to detonate ten-packed passenger plane flying between London and New York. Had the suspensionhappened before the election, it might be enough to change his mind, because voters a major problem with Joe is his continued support for the war in Iraq.

Fearless in the face of rejection, Joe will continue as an independent candidate. As he no doubt consoles, and even Lincoln had his failures, but not to defeat, retreat.

While he will obviously have the Democratic machine behind him, but opposes it, will have little competition forRepublican vote, which in Connecticut is even greater than the Democratic one. Add your ever faithful to democratic advocates, and perhaps even appear winner.

Expectations that the desire for the outcome-even now, he said: "I am an independent Democrat, to seek support Democrats, Republicans and independents in Connecticut. They are the ones who sent me to Washington three times before."

Strangest developments is that what the Democrats celebrated as a victory,Republicans attuned to the slightest political haymaker, used Joe's defeat on trumpet their election re-run of the exaggerated theme, "Democrats are soft on defense."

Dick Cheney even appears carefully calculated SIMPATICO for refusing a Democrat. "It's unfortunate development, I think, in terms of the Democratic Party, see a man like Lieberman pushed aside because of his willingness to support an aggressive stance in terms ofour national security strategy,''Mr. Cheney intoned dishonestly.

Even previously mild-mannered Tony Snow got his lick: "This is a defining moment in some ways the Democratic Party. I know that a lot of people trying to make it a referendum on the president. I could not turn around. I think that instead of determining the moment for the Democratic Party, whose national leaders now have made it clear that if you disagree with the extreme left in their party, that it comesyou. "

We ask all of the most pressing problem. In this political maelstrom there is at least one person who raises our concern, and in fact, our care? You guessed candidate for the eulogy. Jumpin 'Joe Back.

Our interest is not based on whether or not he voted for the war in Iraq continues to believe in its necessity. It is because that in general the kind of intelligent person with a heart we need in Washington, and these valuable people, in the rolefrom politicos, come very rarely, and only one.

Sure, he weaseled about his principles and said he recants his support of the war and architect of the Republican Bush. But he objected, saying: "I know what they want me to do. But I do it because I do not think it's okay." How many of today's politicians, not politicians from other circumstances, would stand on such moral superiority, despite apparent harm to his candidacy,from an opponent who seemed to have a broader appeal while on his entire campaign on anti-war platform.

We note that many voters in Connecticut still go Joe.

'Joe' is still the man for the job, "said one. "He used his power to make a lot of positive things."

In fact, while the Democratic machine, including Dean, Clinton and Schumer, moved to Lamont, only a handful of fans who were interviewed Liebermansaid he would switch to Mr. Lamont.

So while Joe received a reprimand from his party faithful, it seems that still would be on his way back to Washington Metroliner, which we ourselves have seen him shuttle.

Recommend : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

Prospective 2008 presidential candidates: John Edwards

Former North Carolina Senator John Edwards the Democratic nomination will face problems. There was only one term in the U.S. Senate, has not re-elected in 2004, the Democratic vice-presidential candidate. At first glance it is an excellent candidate. He is young, handsome, intelligent, and can have many women, the most important voice of Hillary Clinton.

But his biggest obstacle is the position of notCandidate for the presidency. Candidates on both sides have lost their bid for Vice President without winning its enormous problems for the presidential nomination. For example, the primaries of Joe Lieberman has crashed and burned after the primaries in New Hampshire in January 2004. Previously, Sargent Shriver (1976) and Edmund Muskie (1972) was the last, he is not the Democratic vice-presidential candidate look presidential candidacy, and both refused. InRepublican Party, Bob Dole was in a position to appoint the party by 1996, after a failed attempt to assassinate the Vice President in 1976. But he returned in the first two surveys (1980 and 1988).

Is on the other hand, Edwards more time to campaign than most of his potential opponents. Only the former Virginia Governor Mark Warner could be in a similar amount of free time have to campaign.

Friends Link : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

Barack Obama's Journey in the history (summary)

Palin Interview poverty

Palin's popularity slipping in the polls, and she has nothing better in a disastrous interview with news anchor Charlie Gibson, ABC and CBS news anchor Katie Couric. In the first case, the criticism that Palin knows what to understand the Bush doctrine, so much. But it turned out that she had sometimes lost in their own attempts to answer the question no real answer.

Gibson: We have the right torequire cross-border attacks in Pakistan, Afghanistan, with or without the consent of the Pakistani government?

Conquer Palin: To our right, we will work with these countries, building new relations of cooperation with other allies, but also new, Charlie, go to the point in this world, if not the war be the first option is. In fact, the war as a last resort military attack.

Gibson: But, Governor, I beg you,have the right to go to his head over the border, with or without the consent of the Pakistani government?

PALIN: In order to stop Islamic extremists, those terrorists who seek to destroy America and our allies, we must do everything and we can not blink, Charlie. In dealing with this difficult decision about where we go and even who we target.

Gibson: And let me with this. I have lost in the turmoil of words. Yes, yes, do you think we are entitled togo across the border, with or without the consent of the Pakistani government? To the terrorists in Waziristan area?

Palin: I think America should use all the power to try to destroy the terrorists who hold the hell the United States and its allies. We have all options on the table …

Herbert returned to the Council: "How is it possible that a woman could be elected vice-presidential candidate on the main pageTicket? How is it possible that so many media appearances of like the whole weight of hop on board and a breathtaking ride along? … You can not imagine that John McCain and Barack Obama and Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton and Joe Lieberman does not know what the Bush Doctrine. But Sarah Palin? Absolutely no idea. Ms. Palin problem is not that he was the mayor of a small town or are just in the office while governor of Alaska. Care(and now) is not good in the critical problems facing the country who know one of the most important turning points in history. "

Herbert continued. "I feel for the son of Mrs Palin, the war in Iraq. But our commitment ceremony, which was on the same day as the interview Charlie Gibson, 11, told the public that the soldiers will fight" the enemies who planned and implemented, and the deaths of thousands rejoicedAmericans. "She was aware of distorted history, or even know that Iraq and Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11?" (Source: Bob Herbert is not yet complete, the New York Times Op-Ed column September 12, 2008).

CBS debacle was far worse in some circles, more fun. When Couric asked for 700 billion U.S. dollars to the U.S. government to rescue and support, whether Palin with complex answers to the following: "I've been in a position that Americaand looking to save 700 billion U.S. dollars. And as Senator McCain said, as if to save almost one trillion U.S. dollars, leading to an end, and changes in the Paulson proposal, really I do not believe that Americans want to support and assist them. Attractions in the last few days, I see that Americans are waiting to see how John McCain will do on this proposal. Waiting to see what will Barack Obamado. Is it to do and see how the political wind is blowing? Wait, or John McCain will see this change in Paulson's proposal in order to be implemented. "

Couric: You have said, I quote: "John McCain is the way Wall Street works to reform." Other than supporting stricter regulations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac two years ago, you tell us more examples of his leadership in strengthening the monitoring?

Palin: I think the example that it onlyDocuments, with his warnings two years ago about Fannie and Freddie – that they should not be overestimated. That is more than a hell lot of other senators and representatives did for us.

Couric: But he was in Congress for 26 years. He was Chairman of the Executive Committee business. And he almost always on the side of less regulation, not more.

Palin: He is also known as independent, but when pictures of his own party, and certainly the photos on the other side. The experiment, peopleunderstand what he says, the reform of the public.

Couric: But you tell me more give concrete examples? Because I know that says that Barack Obama will be much talk and no action is taken. Give me an example of hiding 26 years John McCain?

Palin: I can examples of things that John McCain has to show to give their prediction, his pragmatism and his leadership skills. And that is what America needstoday.

Couric: I wanted to ask again – do not belabor points. Specific examples in his 26 years on the transfer of more regulation.

Palin: I'll try to find and to make it for you

Palin was obviously not ready, and then mercilessly in the late-night talk-show programs, and criticized other places of comedy. One of them was the show Saturday Night Live, where Palin's dismal performance was skewered by Tina Fey. For most of the clips of the week, parodyIt seems several newscasts.

In later interviews, McCain Palin appears before the camera. These include hand-holding session, Sean Hannity of Fox News, which is more embarrassing than enlightening.

Nobody bought the idea of Palin as a "conservative financial policy. Eugene Robinson wrote
"It is a conservative fiscal policy that abhors pork barrel projects and said no thank Bridgestone," To Nowhere "- the range of 398 million U.S. dollars that are connectedKetchikan, Alaska, at the airport in the losguazunchos Narrows. But as mayor of Wasilla (population 9780), but asked Washington lobbyists home bacon. And as a candidate for the office two years ago, she supported the Ketchikan bridge and the Congress retains the bulk of the costs paid. "(Source: Eugene Robinson, cynicism Express, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, September 2, 2008).

GOP attempt to destroy the effect. Supporters of Palin dismissedplayfully sexist attacks on the elite, the liberal media. They argued that a mirror image of Sarah "small town America," and that the only thing the electorate depending on whether he wants to take over as president if McCain's disability or death. Ignores the fact that most of the feeling that he could not.

McCain has other problems. At first he gave it to the side of the President "90% of the time" to Obama campaignRepeat ad naseum. Also pointed out that McCain denounced Bush's first tax cuts and now they always told yet. In the first debate, Obama even mentioned McCain supported the war in Iraq and the Arizona senator said that the war is not only good, but it will be over soon, and America is in this country, welcomed as liberators. Nothing like this has happened, as America remains in Iraq over three years after President Bush declared "missionperfect. "

Obama said "John, you have the war began in 2007 to do. You talk about economic growth. An outbreak of the war in 2003, when the war began, he said, will quickly and easily. You said you knew where the WMD. think again. You said that you can be welcomed as liberators. you were wrong. They said there was no history of violence between Shiites and Sunnis. And you were wrong. … So my question soundsCase … "

The Beat Goes On …
As Congress began debate on a package of 700 billion U.S. dollars for the financial sector difficulties with McCain campaign co-operatives continue to shoot themselves in the foot. Former Texas Senator Phil Gramm, McCain's top economic adviser and campaign co-president, said in an interview with the Associated Press: "You have heard about the treatment of depression, mental health crisis," he said. "We have a recession, we have had another. We have a littleNation of whiners … Listen to this constant whining, complaining about the loss of competitiveness, America in decline. "

Gramm remarks were condemned. McCain denounced the remarks and nine days later came grams

McCain seemed to be in a position to win every train, even after the first debate. Should a debate that would benefit them in the middle of its foreign policy, a clothing store, where he claimed that Obama was weak and lack leadership.The debate took a few days after the suspension of his campaign, McCain announced that in order to concentrate on the mortgage crisis on Wall Street.

McCain, when he traveled to Washington, he had surgery a few pictures, including one in which the White House, where he and Senator Obama, along with several other members of the congress was convened at the request of President George W. Bush. A day later, I vote for rescue package and. Democrats voted for, but offended some Republican Senatorsthoughtless remarks of the Democratic House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, the Republicans criticized as the fiscal mess. McCain was, as someone who can see the troops to rally, and among the critics went to Oxford, Mississippi for the debate.

Obama wants the rest of the debate, while McCain came as hyperactivity, repeated the whole discussion on a condescending tone "I'm afraid Senator Obama does not understand …"

Obama: … You can not separate Afghanistan from Iraq, because what weCommanders said the troops we now have to do with Afghanistan. So I would send two to three brigades in Afghanistan. Now remember that we are four times the number of troops in Iraq, where nobody do with 9 / 11 before we went, not really al-Qaida prior to the plant, but there are four times more troops than we in Afghanistan . This is a strategic mistake, because every message that al confirmed –Qaeda is the greatest threat to the United States and that U.S. Secretary of Defense Gates acknowledged the central front – the place where there are these people in Afghanistan and Pakistan …

McCain: We need to reach people in Pakistan. He [Obama] said that the imposition of military attacks in Pakistan. You do not have to do. Do not talk loudly. If so, you need to do things and work with PakistanThe government … And yes, Senator Obama calls for troops, but you do not understand the new strategy, condemned the same strategy in Iraq. It will be deployed in Afghanistan … So it's not just soldiers, with the exception of the cases. It is a strategy that will have success. And Pakistan is a key element in this context. I know how to work with him. I guarantee you, I want to publicly declare that I will attack them.

Obama: Who saidAttack on Pakistan. Here's what I said. And if John wants to disagree, please let me know if the United States, al-Qaida, bin Laden, top officers of the level of our sights and Pakistan is not acting in the capacity or is unwilling, we are . Now I think this is the right strategy, I think it is good policy. John and I – you are absolutely right that presidents have to be careful what they say. But you know, to know from you who you, in the pastExtinction threat in North Korea, as you know, sung songs about bombing Iran, I do not know, you know, how credible it is …

McCain: I – I do not believe that Senator Obama understands that there is a failed state in Pakistan, Musharraf, when he came to power … I have a record. I have a report on the participation in these national security issues, including the responsible and difficult decisions that the President may, and we send our young men and womenFor reasons of security …
Obama: … Ask the next president, we have a good decision to keep America as safe precisely because sending our military into battle is like a big step.
(Hint: The Discussion Papers have been modified to improve readability).

The remarkable differences in the electoral debate, said ABC, said that more than half of those polled Obama won. Approximately one third of the so-called McCain the winner. CBS saw Obama 39% McCain 24% and 37% believed thatdraw.

In the elections approached, intense personal attacks on Obama. Sarah Palin accuses the senator of "Palling with terrorists." They rationalized Obama's comments should further explain his relationship with Bill Ayers, because he was not honest. Few noticed that the terrorists in the plural. There were also complaints about "Obama's socialist" is what he said one of the voters (in the McCain campaign as "immortalized JoePlumber "), the purpose of the $ 250,000 or more tax" redistribution of wealth. "

Rove, et al. Obama's "tax cuts" government donations, "he said, most people do not go to work, so that no tax to pay. During the demonstrations, which they allegedly threatening several people in the crowd comments about Obama such as" Kill him! Ignore "and" Off with Head ", and McCain's reaction:" We have heard some things, "said Senator ObamaRally. "

Even Fox News clips produced to support claims McCain.

New poll showed that voters are not interested in these "problems". Their top concerns of the economy (especially the high prices of food and gas), the chaos on Wall Street, healthcare, the war in Iraq and taxes. Your favorite Obama on the economy and give McCain a small lead on foreign policy, even after the election, Obama is a Vice President, Joe Biden, "Guaranteed" that Obama will"tested in the first six months with an international crisis.

McCain suffered a devastating blow if they are loyal Republican Secretary of State Colin Powell endorsed Obama. More bad news came. [] NBC / Wall Street Journal poll has Obama 10 points ahead in the country. 60% of respondents in the CNN poll showed the McCain attacks on Obama unfair, a figure that hurts McCain's chances for further independent voters. Reuters / Zogby Obama's 8 point leadRecent monitoring studies. Taking Pew study, the inclusion of mobile phone users, Obama needs by 14 points. It is expected that these amounts in the coming days, the full impact of Powell will see results confirm the choice. "(Source: Steven Reynolds, Palin McCain campaign tone. Alternet.org, October 22, 2008)

Palin and McCain continue to argue that Obama, the country is vulnerable, directed and appeared in the camp, the fears that ObamaThe senator from Illinois resists. In response to the criticism, Obama said McCain called the ad "erratic" and "Out of Touch" on the economy. The campaign to recall that McCain voters two decades ago was convicted financier Charles Keating in connection with the S-and L-disaster. While McCain was found guilty of a crime, the Senate Ethics Committee found that a "bad decision".

Opinion polls showed the race tighteningin the traditionally Republican. Critics of the GOP candidates have expressed their concern reflects the fact that McCain is the publication of choice by the Rev. Wright issue, video tapes showing Wright shouting, "No," God Bless America "but damn America!" Another problem so that the staff of McCain that Palin did not hear her, she was adamant about the things their way. There were no whispers that McCain realized that an error in the rationale for her and Tom Ridge, a consultantCampaign, the journalist said tickets would be better served if McCain is elected it.

Palin: Airhead, DIVA

Although he set out with Joe Biden in the only vice presidential debate in the bar at a low level. Democrats and many scientists expect, faux pas. She managed to make the debate, without, like Gerald Ford bones, but the criticism that the abnormal pławionych several questions and her winkThe audience clapped immaturity and recklessness.

"During the Vice Presidential Debate Thursday announced the governor of Alaska Sarah Palin, saying it" will not demand a response from the moderators or hear you. Provided "Indeed," at least 10 times, Palin, that were specific reactions is generally completed, ignored a question about this page, or easy. On NBC's Meet the Press, today's debate, moderator Gwen Ifill said Palin "more than ignored" her questions."Blew me think," the technical term, "Ifill. "(Source: Ifill: Palin" Blew Me Off "in the debate. Http: / / thinkprogress.org, October 5, 2008).

l
Palin remains to be explained gaffes, including their inability to function of the Vice President. The third question Grader Vice President, what he does, Palin Vice-out "run the Senate" and "can really with the senators and a lot of good policy changes." The facts areIf the president does not fulfill its function, the VP is about. Sole responsibility of the commander of the second issue is not the chairman of the Senate and the decisive vote in case of an impasse.

DEMOCRATIC STRATEGY

Breast Obama's War (more than 700 million U.S. dollars), had him in large part to advertise, in = George W. Bush won in 2000 and 2004. This has forced McCain on the allocation of resources in areas never thought he was. McCain plays defense and preventionObama went to pay dirt.

It was no secret that Southern Democrats had a strategy, you can trust. So I plan to implement Western Blitzkrieg. It was important for two reasons. McCain of Arizona was high in the west and in the youth segment of the vote in Utah and Nevada allies in Mitt Romney, Mormon. Secondly, in 2004, George W. Bush said victory in the four states with Democratic Governors (New Mexico. Montana, Wyoming and Arizona)."These countries, which coordinate with Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Nevada and Utah as a whole. It is the sum of the 53 electoral votes, nearly as many as 55 California, which is very democratic. Add this 108-block of votes in New York Illinois and Pennsylvania, all of which were democratically every election since 1992 (73 delegates) and the amount of 2 / 3 the way to the White House. "(Source: Timothy N. Stella, Sr., Go West, Young Men: The democratic Future. Useless Knowledge, July 30, 2005).

Bill Richardson understood the power of the Spanish block of votes, said: "These are times of political change … We need to band together, which means that Hispanics in Florida, Cuban Americans, Mexican Americans, Puerto Ricans, South Americans – we need to network better . We need more politically minded, we must set aside and think of themselves as Latinos, as Hispanics more than we in the past. "

His efforts have paid off for ObamaNew Mexico, which Bush went in 2000 and 2004, but went 57-42 Obama. Other western and south-west, that Obama was in Colorado, Montana and Nevada, and, as expected, California, Oregon and Washington. Only conclude that Obama lost a significant Latino population Arizona and Texas. It is estimated that Obama was the choice of 73% of Latin Americans. The percentage of black votes was higher than 90%.

McCAIN division in the camp?

Rumors abound that Palinwas "difficult" and did not want to learn. Employees, McCain said later, Carl Cameron, Fox News that Palin does not understand, understand basic knowledge about the society, the functions of law and government, not the three countries that are part of NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement are) that do not list all the countries from which North America. It was said that he thought that Africa is a country and continent. According to this anonymous McCain staff, sheI thought that South Africa, the southern part of the "country". Late-night talk show, David Letterman hosr later joke: "Did NAFTA stands for Need Another Fofty thousand per accessory." (Source: Late Show with David Letterman. November 5, 2008).

Is it true or not, if the report believe many people, and this damage Palin is likely to resolve in a position to him. Palin anonymous critics "cowards" and adds: "If there is a presumptionQuestions and comments, I'm in prep debate on NAFTA, and on the Continent in the country, if we were talking about Africa, they ripped out of context. It is cruel, it's disgusting. It is immature. It is unprofessional and you guys are idiots … "(Source: Dan Joling and Sharon Theimer, condemned criticism of Palin is a coward. Yahoonews.com, November 7, 2008).

Earlier this week, the debts of the campaign staff Nicole Wallace, Palin in her arms during the interviewwith Katie Couric and her negative attitude. Is Republican strategist Ed Rollins said Palin, "[It] is certainly the most popular Republican in this country if something ends." (Source: Dana Bash Palin's off-script comments irritate McCain adviser. Cnnpolitics.com, October 27, 2008). In an interview with Matt Lauer NBS'c defending Wallace, Palin said: "[It] has done nothing wrong. It is probably the most diva-politician I have ever seen." I n (refers to the election of McCainWallace said: "It was a wise decision that will look smart in time. (Source: Video: Nicole Wallace has always defended Palin Matt Lauer. Msnbc.com, November 7, 2008).

Were rumors that the staff was Randy Scheunemann, only once for McCain, who feared that the stories will be read the campaign Newswires published a few days before the election. After the election, Fox News, Palin defended her, insists that the stories were satisfied murmurs HelpersMcCain defeat excuse not look too bad, and cooperation with other campaigns.

Meanwhile, blacks held their breath to expect and hope for the best but the worst. They believed that if the Republicans to steal the election no other white men (in 2000, Gore, Kerry in 2004), and to intensify their efforts to reduce African-American candidate.

Associated Press Writer Jesse Washington said: "Obama's victory is a potentialpreviously unimaginable victory, after centuries of racism. But is the hope, pride and fear: Electoral vote harassment inaccuracies or type of injustice and violence in the past from the Afro-American progress thwarted. "(Source: Jesse Washington, a black conservative Ask Obama Win Joy. The Associated Press, November 2, 2008).

The decisions taken will be announced shortly, just before 9 pm PT, with an estimated 194 electoral votes Obama will. There was no doubt that this victoryWashington, Oregon, California and in his home state of Hawaii, a total of 76 votes. In addition, he won the working class whites in Pennsylvania and Ohio. Until then, McCain had sounded the bell. Resolved, after the results of the campaign headquarters for the Pennsylvania McCain, but someone from the BlackBerry or cell phone, he heard the bell.

4. November 2008

Overcome the steep odds, and press the Clinton machine to survive GOP attack Barack Hussein Obama44 was U.S. president said, and the first black elected to the position.

The success of the outcome of the entry into the circle, who remained faithful. There were no leaks and the nickname "No Drama Obama." Obama was just a clever and effective campaign, along with the shortcomings and failures of the Clinton machine and McCain. That does not mean that Obama, "the White House. He won the American public, and even more to gain their trust.He gained more than white men and white women, researchers believe that the segment will go to him. He used to Hillary Clinton and intelligent campaign manger, David Axelrod.

A reporter was told McCain, "McCain we are voting McCain gone. He was a champion of the little used, some of the tricks (the suspension of the campaign Joe the Plumber, celebrity, commercial). It is not about partisanship, not toInstincts. He was assisted by his advisers of the place where he was dressed in his objectivity. If you ran a disciplined, focused campaign issue of the real system officer who believes (or CT Senator Joe Lieberman MN) Governor Tim Pawlenty of the substance of this plant are very different from the way competitive, and the struggle more. A greater ability to shape the debate, and not just reacting. "(Source: My Super,5 reasons why McCain lost demconwatchblog.com November 5, 2008).

Both Clinton and McCain can look back upon and see what happens. Do you have another master, the politician underestimated gravel. Not possible to confirm that the United States wants to change the public vote and intelligence. Disorder, panic-mongering and character assassination will not work. Obama never panicked and kept in place on all issues.

Obama won the popular vote, 52-46, or 65,293,08357325487 votes for the second highest total compensation in the McCain story, and enough to win the next election years. Obama won the votes of women and men, 49-48 and 56-43, respectively. He won the demographic 18-29, 66% to 32% and won in each age group over 65 years, with the exception of those who went 53-45 McCain.

The last game: Obama 365 electoral votes, McCain 173rd

Recommend : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน

Joe Lieberman and the Democratic Far Left

Senator Joe Lieberman, Connecticut, who lost only registered Democratic primary candidate for a fourth term as an "independent Democrat. Senator Lieberman, it seems too soft and not too partisan, a new distance from the Democratic Party left. It seems that today If you opt for Democrats to office, keep the far left of the line, and must vote to condemn and fight against everything that the Republicans held. It is OK to lie, it's ok, but you can not cheatinga bit daring, a Republican, says, accept it or not.

Michael Moore wrote:
Let's defeat echoes Senator Joe Lieberman send a cold shiver to the back of every Democrat who supported the invasion of Iraq and continue to support meaningless in any case, immoral, unwinnable war. Make no mistake: We, the majority of Americans say the war is over – and is actively working on each of you who supported immediate defeatEnd of the war.

Arianna Huffington wrote:
Lieberman, what they are doing is an act of treason and should be treated as such. Democratic donors, as Rick Jacobs suggests, should be aware that another Democrat office of a cent see it as support to Lamont.
and
Bottom line: All Democrats should start immediately, the treatment of Lieberman, who forced – landing on the water-party, party-pooping, control of Congress at the risk of spoilers, ie the riskParty.

Nevada, Harry Reid and Senators Chuck Schumer, New York, said
The idea was that (Lieberman) to George Bush too close, and it is in many ways a referendum on the president more than anything else.

By Stephanie Reitz Associated Press
Top leaders threw their support to Lamont, an anti-war opponents, who said Lieberman was too supported the war and President Bush.

It seems to me thatDemocratic politicians are not and can no longer rely on the Americans. Extreme left and the robot must follow the party, or may be ejected.

Recommend : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน