Iraq: the consequences of withdrawal

Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who recently said the Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to halt the best way for him to stop ongoing violence and to begin with stability and security to the U.S. withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Khamenei was explicit in his desire for a speedy withdrawal of U.S. troops but also the consequences of a premature withdrawal of U.S. troops, not less than catastrophic.

There are three parties, with the exception ofU.S. Democrats who are actively managed for the elimination of U.S. and coalition troops from Iraq, Iran, Iraq, the group of radical Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr and the foreign jihadis who flocked to Iraq in the face of the global war on terror .

Iran is making a concerted effort to establish itself as a leading country in the Middle East. To achieve this strategic goal, Khamenei and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is active againstUnited States of America for its nuclear program in Iran to present as a nation, are counted. At the same time, the Iranians have used Hezbollah is a proxy war against Israel and the Shiite south of Iraq in behavior foment unrest that threatens the fragile government in Baghdad.

During the conflict in Lebanon, Shiite and Sunni violence is increasingly more evidence in the West that Iran is concentrating ability and willingness to destabilize the entire region on the political levelProfits. U.S. out of Iraq would not be sufficient to prevent the Iranians from turning Iraq into a satellite that will help that could be the hegemony of Iran in the Middle East to stop.

Muqtada al-Sadr was a thorn in the US-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003. His Mahdi Army against U.S. and coalition troops in battle and his followers are focused largely responsible for the Shiite death squads in the Sunni minority and pushing Iraq closer to all-outCivil war. Al-Sadr has close ties with Shiite leaders in Iran linked are, and he constantly calls for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. There are no U.S. troops would be al-Sadr's militia to carry out a campaign of genocide Sunnis, while Iran provides more influence over the government in Baghdad.

At the end of the world, Islamic extremists are traveling to Iraq to join the fight against the U.S. and the West. Al-Qaida in Iraq andvarious other fundamentalist groups, and only a minority of the Iraqi guerrillas are determined to take advantage of the current chaos of war against all, including Iraqis who oppose the establishment of an Islamic state. Withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq would not dare jihadists, then promote the use of a power vacuum to Islamic principles, much like the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Ask About Silk to leave America on Iraqare groups with most to lose in case of withdrawal of U.S. troops.

First on the list is the current Iraqi government of national unity. Leaders in Baghdad, knew that the presence of coalition troops, the only reason why was the situation in Iraq, will be transferred to total war. Withdrawal of U.S. troops and their allies to leave the Sunni branch of the dead free use of their sectarian war, and can stand the fledgling Iraqi army to stop the bloodshed. InIn a full-fledged sectarian violence, broke the government in Baghdad, so that a gap that is likely to be occupied by the Iranians.

The second group, in contrast to the U.S. withdrawal from the Sunni minority. Yes, it is true that the Sunnis, the majority of the war of resistance against the armed forces of the coalition. But the Sunnis are fighting for a place in the Shiite-dominated society in Iraq. With strong American and Iraqi troops are fighting against the central government,A chip on the group, which is certainly the destruction of religious war. Strange twist in order to attack the Sunnis, Americans, they can remain on the political accommodation will be reached.

Finally, a neighbor of Iraq, serious concerns about Iran, the Shiite-led Iraq that could threaten Sunni Arab regimes in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and the entire Middle East. Although none of these governments, like the idea of the U.S. –Soldiers in the region, especially over a longer alternative in the form of the Iraqi-Iranian alliance that would dominate the entire Middle East, is even more disgusting.

Despite the problems in Iraq to fight the United States until the end. Fragile national unity government in Baghdad a chance of survival.

Pull the U.S. troops by the jihadists have long sought victoryAmerica look weak in the eyes of the world, Iraq will be stuck in a bloody civil war, which would lead to a power vacuum in the Middle East, Iran as a regional hegemon. These are the real consequences of a premature U.S. withdrawal.

My Links : ±1±: ข่าวเด่นประจำวัน อัพเดททุกวัน